[dev] Redundant index in table mnemo_memos?

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting Duck <duck at obala.net>:

> Another example is Kronolith. Where the occurrence type is always in integer.
> But in the table structure is defined as varchar(11). This should be fixed in
> the next releases, as not requires any programming. Because in general the
> structure is just copied in and now one bothers about it.

Weird. Thanks for pointing that out. And you, and everyone, please  
point these things out on purpose. If it looks weird and there's no  
comment explaning it, there's a decent chance it's outdated or just  
wrong.

I've just committed fixes for the Kronolith stuff.

-chuck

-- 
"we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris