[dev] [cvs] commit: incubator/oscar/config conf.xml incubator/oscar/lib Oscar.php

[Michael Rubinsky]

Jan Schneider  wrote on 9/10/07 11:52 am

>Zitat von Michael Rubinsky 
><mike at theupstairsroom.co
>m>:
>
>> Quoting Jan Schneider 
><jan at horde.org>:
>>
>>> Zitat von Michael 
>Rubinsky 
><mike at theupstairsroom.co
>m>:
>>>
>>>> Quoting Jan Schneider 
><jan at horde.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> Zitat von Michael 
>Rubinsky 
><mike at theupstairsroom.co
>m>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> mrubinsk    
>2007-09-09 23:51:06 EDT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Modified files:
>>>>>>   oscar/config         
>conf.xml
>>>>>>   oscar/lib            
>Oscar.php
>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>> We should use a 
>configuration parameter for 
>an alias to oscar's
>>>>>> VFS dir (like we do in 
>Ansel). This make it more 
>obvious that you 1)
>>>>>> need a file based vfs, 
>and 2) that you must create 
>an alias to the
>>>>>> proper dir in the VFS 
>for oscar to function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually we should not 
>require a file based VFS.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed, although we will 
>still need a web accessable 
>directory to
>>>> store the flv files out of 
>though, correct?  Should I 
>just re-word
>>>> the  configuration 
>description then...maybe 
>make it a fully
>>>> qualified url  in the case 
>the VFS represents a 
>directory on another
>>>> web server? I'm  still not 
>clear on how viewing the 
>flash files out
>>>> of a sql based vfs  would 
>work, though that is just 
>probably my own
>>>> lack of understanding :)
>>>
>>> It's the same like in Ansel. 
>Files are generally provided 
>through a
>>> script, so the VFS 
>backend doesn't matter. 
>Having an alias that points
>>> directly to VFS_file 
>directory is only an 
>exception.
>>
>> OK. Sorry for being so 
>dense about this, but in 
>Ansel, if we don't  
>> use  the direct vfs method, 
>then don't we have to pass 
>the actual  
>> raw image  data to the 
>browser, instead of 
>outputing an <img> tag?   
>> Can something  similar be 
>done with flash files?  I 
>thought you had  
>> to provide a src  for the file 
>when embedding the plugin?  
>Again,  
>> sorry for being so  dense 
>about this, as I don't have a 
>whole lot of  
>> experience with using  this 
>plugin...
>
>Take a look at 
>Ansel::getImageUrl() which is 
>taking care of proving  
>the correct url anywhere we 
>need to reference it in a src 
>attribute.
>
>Jan.
ah.  Never mind.  It hit me as I was driving in my  car!   One of those times I wish I could recall an email :)

sorry...