[dev] Jonah vs. Thomas
Michael Rubinsky
mike at theupstairsroom.com
Thu Oct 25 13:29:08 UTC 2007
Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
> Zitat von Michael Rubinsky <mike at theupstairsroom.com>:
>
>> Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck at horde.org>:
>>
>>> Quoting Michael Rubinsky <mike at theupstairsroom.com>:
>>>
>>> Speaking of all this, what's your take on Jonah vs. Thomas?
>>
>> Well, I think that for a *community* type of blog where you have a
>> group of people contributing regularly then Thomas *might* be a
>> better choice but, personally, I've been using Jonah to power a
>> number of blog-like websites and I think that Jonah provides more
>> flexibility for that type of use, has a more fully featured api
>> etc... I don't know, I'm thinking that might be a better way to go
>> for us...some quick thoughts include creating an aggregate feed for
>> all the horde feeds we currently pull now....create a composite
>> feed that serves as the 'Official' news - pulling an internal feed
>> from each of the devs etc...
>>
>> Of course, some of that depends on how you wanted to present the
>> articles - integrated into our website (my choice) or a link from
>> the site to a Jonah / Thomas install.
>
> I have to admit I didn't take a closer look at Thomas recently, and I
> the discussion I want to start is not related to the horde website at
> all.
>
> So, I still think that having two feed/news/blog applications doesn't
> make a whole lot of sense. I have spent a lot of time with Jonah but
> IMO it's not worth to work on two feed creators with the limited
> developer resources we have. Assuming that Thomas provides us with the
> feed generation capabilities that Jonah has, or can at least be
> updated easily to be on par with it, how about making Jonah a pure
> feed aggregator and reader?
I'd have to at least partially disagree. While I agree that there is
some overlap between the two apps, I see Jonah as a more flexible,
customizable application. With Jonah and it's api, I can maintain
"news" for a number of different websites from the same Horde install.
These are not necessarily "Blogs". I can create a different channel
for each website and composite some of those feeds together if needed.
In some ways, I can see it being used as a mini-CMS. While Thomas is
an excellent choice for maintaining a community Blog, it's a
completely different paradigm. I think it would be awkward to
implement different feeds like that in a Blog application.
> Obviously we finally need to allow users
> to add and manage their own feeds, but that's a different story.
Agreed. Whichever way we go we should allow creation of both internal
and external feeds per user, maybe adding a creation permission or
similar.
Thanks,
mike
--
The Horde Project (www.horde.org)
mrubinsk at horde.org
"Time just hates me. That's why it made me an adult." - Josh Joplin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: PGP Digital Signature
Url : http://lists.horde.org/archives/dev/attachments/20071025/d7850605/attachment.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 2013 bytes
Desc: PGP Public Key
Url : http://lists.horde.org/archives/dev/attachments/20071025/d7850605/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the dev
mailing list