[dev] whups - priorities vs urgency and importance
Jan Schneider
jan at horde.org
Thu Apr 16 10:00:33 UTC 2009
Zitat von Craig Lawson <craig.lawson at webengineer.co.uk>:
> Hello to the dev list...
>
> I've been running on circles on this and I'm not sure where else to
> turn, I hope its just a case of my missing something simple ...
>
> Basically we're trying to get whups configured in the optimal way to
> assist with our project management and we're almost there, trouble
> is I am having trouble with the priority concept.
>
> Forgive me if this is obvious or I have missed something, my
> understanding is that to manage projects effectively it is common to
> have both an urgency (1 - 5 typically, higher the number the more
> urgent) and an importance (same rating). This is to enable
> appropriate scheduling of time around issues so that the long terms
> aims of a project don't get lost dealing with the short term aims.
>
> I have tried in whups to create a custom attribute to handle this,
> however I cant query sorted by this value, only on those values that
> match a given value for this field. Ideally I want to have priority
> to represent the urgency and to have an importance field showing
> along side all bugs in all search views - is this posable? Can
> anyone point me in the right direction to look to sort this?
You don't miss anything. You can't sort by custom attributes at the
moment. This would be hard to implement anyway, because to simply sort
by the attribute value might not be what you want.
Jan.
--
Do you need professional PHP or Horde consulting?
http://horde.org/consulting/
More information about the dev
mailing list