[doc] IMP 3.0 FAQ

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting Eric J Rostetter <eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu>:

> What does this mean?  Are we supposed to replace the 2.x stuff with
> 3.x stuff? Augment the existing stuff with 3.x stuff?  Or at another
> tree for the 3.x stuff?  Please advise.

I'd say to add a new section to the FAQ for IMP 3.0, and make sure to 
differentiate it from the 2.2 stuff. But Rich really ought to have veto over 
whatever gets done, if he has time to peek at it... Rich?

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"A dream which helps you to live your reality with dignity
 and justice is a good dream." - Tariq Ramadan