[horde] Compatibility with Red Hat 9.0

[Brent J. Nordquist]

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Edward Burr <horde at email.burr.cc> wrote:

> > Exactly; and the previous ones aren't a good idea for RH 9 because with
> > Apache 2.x the /etc/httpd conventions have changed, etc.  This is "on my
> > list" also.
>
> As far as I can tell, the config options that horde uses really aren't
> all that different. I suppose it could be argued that you should use
> /etc/httpd/conf.d/horde.conf instead of adding on to the end of
> /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, but even that wouldn't be a major problem.

That was indeed what I was thinking of... like you said, not fatal, but
when I create them I want to follow the new convention.  The "foo.d
directory" approach is always much cleaner to install/remove anyway.

> The only real concern I have is that Red Hat still does not provide
> mcal or php-mcal, used by kronolith.

Yeah... I'm on the Red Hat Beta Team and I've been pestering the
appropriate people every release cycle but no dice yet.  :-)

> Do you forsee any problems there, or will kronolith be fine without
> mcal?

A lot of people use Kronolith with SQL (we're doing that here).  I think
the only drawback when using SQL is lack of alarms.

-- 
Brent J. Nordquist <bjn at horde.org> N0BJN
Other contact information: http://www.nordist.net/contact.html
* Fast pipe * Always on * Get out of the way - Tim Bray http://tinyurl.com/7sti