[horde] Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0

[Louis-Philippe Allard]

I Concur.  The dynamic view *should* be kept.  All modern PIM solutions are
using a dynamic view of some sort...
On 2012-04-19 12:51 PM, "Simon Brereton" <simon.brereton at buongiorno.com>
wrote:

> On 19 April 2012 12:02, Andreas Mauser <andreas at mauser.info> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ----- Nachricht von lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de ---------
> >  Datum: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:32:47 +0200
> >    Von: lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de
> > Betreff: Re: [horde] Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0
> >     An: horde at lists.horde.org
> >
> >
> >> Zitat von Gunnar Wrobel <wrobel at pardus.de>:
> >>
> >>> --
> >>> Core Developer
> >>>
> >>> The Horde Project
> >>>
> >>> e: wrobel at horde.org
> >>> t: +49 700 6245 0000
> >>> w: http://www.horde.org
> >>>
> >>> pgp: 9703 43BE
> >>> tweets: http://twitter.com/pardus_de
> >>> blog: http://log.pardus.de
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Gunnar Wrobel <wrobel at pardus.de> schrieb:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Nicolás Ilich Samus" <nicolas at unq.edu.ar> schrieb:
> >>>
> >>>> I'm not sure if it's obvious or a detail, but i think is important to
> >>>> hold the menus at top if the user scrolls down in the application.
> >>>> It's really annoying in an application when is needed scroll up to
> >>>> make an action or open another app in a new tab and then scroll down
> >>>> again to return to the working point.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The dynamic interfaces we currently have for imp and kronolith work
> >>> with a fixed screen size. So I would say that is the direction we
> >>> are heading towards.
> >>>
> >>> If we keep the static views it might be more difficult there. We
> >>> don't have a fixed menu for them right now and I'm not certain the
> >>> effort would be worth it.
> >>
> >>
> >> We have disabled the dynamic views after many support calls from
> >> people using it and only use the static as of now. Not having the
> >> static view or something similar would probably mean not using Horde
> >> anymore in our case.
> >
> >
> > I support this statement.
> >
> > When using Dynamic Views I often get the feeling that not everything
> plays
> > together, not all is logically aligned, and the most annoying case (at
> this
> > time) is that not all is dynamic at the moment. Arising questions.
> >
> > I could see a fully dynamic and logically aligned horde in the future,
> or a
> > horde not being (easily) used anymore.
> >
> > Please dont feel hit on the leg, for I just want also help make horde a
> > super Groupware at all.
> > And to mention, I still feel that Horde is best choice, still, in things
> of
> > Groupware.
>
> The team have stated on several occasions that Horde4 is not perfect,
> but it had to make the changes to make Horde5 a realistic opportunity.
>
> No one should give up on dynamic view because people in the
> organisation are resistant to change.
>
> Simon
> --
> Horde mailing list
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
> To unsubscribe, mail: horde-unsubscribe at lists.horde.org
>