[horde] Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0

[Andreas Mauser]

I agree

----- Nachricht von Louis-Philippe Allard <lp.allard.1 at gmail.com> ---------
   Datum: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:59:59 -0400
     Von: Louis-Philippe Allard <lp.allard.1 at gmail.com>
Betreff: Re: [horde] Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0
      An: simon.brereton at buongiorno.com
      Cc: horde <horde at lists.horde.org>


> I Concur.  The dynamic view *should* be kept.  All modern PIM solutions are
> using a dynamic view of some sort...

I never said its 'bad' thing.
I just meant that 'I' feel that the dynamic view is just not 'ready' yet.

Andreas

> On 2012-04-19 12:51 PM, "Simon Brereton" <simon.brereton at buongiorno.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 19 April 2012 12:02, Andreas Mauser <andreas at mauser.info> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > ----- Nachricht von lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de ---------
>> >  Datum: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:32:47 +0200
>> >    Von: lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de
>> > Betreff: Re: [horde] Fwd: Re: Interface design Horde 4.1/5.0
>> >     An: horde at lists.horde.org
>> >
>> >
>> >> Zitat von Gunnar Wrobel <wrobel at pardus.de>:
>> >>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Core Developer
>> >>>
>> >>> The Horde Project
>> >>>
>> >>> e: wrobel at horde.org
>> >>> t: +49 700 6245 0000
>> >>> w: http://www.horde.org
>> >>>
>> >>> pgp: 9703 43BE
>> >>> tweets: http://twitter.com/pardus_de
>> >>> blog: http://log.pardus.de
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Gunnar Wrobel <wrobel at pardus.de> schrieb:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> "Nicolás Ilich Samus" <nicolas at unq.edu.ar> schrieb:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I'm not sure if it's obvious or a detail, but i think is important to
>> >>>> hold the menus at top if the user scrolls down in the application.
>> >>>> It's really annoying in an application when is needed scroll up to
>> >>>> make an action or open another app in a new tab and then scroll down
>> >>>> again to return to the working point.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> The dynamic interfaces we currently have for imp and kronolith work
>> >>> with a fixed screen size. So I would say that is the direction we
>> >>> are heading towards.
>> >>>
>> >>> If we keep the static views it might be more difficult there. We
>> >>> don't have a fixed menu for them right now and I'm not certain the
>> >>> effort would be worth it.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> We have disabled the dynamic views after many support calls from
>> >> people using it and only use the static as of now. Not having the
>> >> static view or something similar would probably mean not using Horde
>> >> anymore in our case.
>> >
>> >
>> > I support this statement.
>> >
>> > When using Dynamic Views I often get the feeling that not everything
>> plays
>> > together, not all is logically aligned, and the most annoying case (at
>> this
>> > time) is that not all is dynamic at the moment. Arising questions.
>> >
>> > I could see a fully dynamic and logically aligned horde in the future,
>> or a
>> > horde not being (easily) used anymore.
>> >
>> > Please dont feel hit on the leg, for I just want also help make horde a
>> > super Groupware at all.
>> > And to mention, I still feel that Horde is best choice, still, in things
>> of
>> > Groupware.
>>
>> The team have stated on several occasions that Horde4 is not perfect,
>> but it had to make the changes to make Horde5 a realistic opportunity.
>>
>> No one should give up on dynamic view because people in the
>> organisation are resistant to change.
>>
>> Simon
>> --
>> Horde mailing list
>> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
>> To unsubscribe, mail: horde-unsubscribe at lists.horde.org
>>
> --
> Horde mailing list
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
> To unsubscribe, mail: horde-unsubscribe at lists.horde.org


----- Ende der Nachricht von Louis-Philippe Allard  
<lp.allard.1 at gmail.com> -----