[horde] activesync sent items unreadable in imp and how to set full name

[Michael Rubinsky]

Quoting Tom Seeley <horde at tomseeley.co.uk>>
> Quoting Michael Rubinsky <mrubinsk at horde.org>:
>
>> Quoting Tom Seeley <horde at tomseeley.co.uk>>
>>> Quoting Tom Seeley <horde at tomseeley.co.uk>:
>>>
>>>> 2. The activesync sent email sets my full name to "tom", which is  
>>>> not what is set in the horde/imp profile.  Where does horde  
>>>> activesync get this value from?
>>>
>>> So it would appear that my first problem (incorrect mime types) is  
>>> common, does anyone have any insight on my second issue (above)?
>>>
>>> Currently when I send emails from my activesync client (a galaxy  
>>> s2) they come from:
>>>
>>>   tom <horde at tomseeley.co.uk>
>>>
>>> Instead of:
>>>
>>>  Tom Seeley <horde at tomseeley.co.uk>
>>>
>>> Which is what I get when I compose in IMP.
>>>
>>>
>> This is determined by the client.
>
> OK, this is really quite annoying, it seem that Samsung in their  
> infinite wisdom actually hide the "your name" option on the  
> activesync setup pages of their android devices.  This doesn't  
> matter for real Exchange users, because Exchange actually changes it  
> to your Active Directory configured displayname (tested on this  
> phone with Exchange 2010).  They've apparently done this on the S3  
> aswell.
>
> References:
> People trying to work around the problem by being really quick with  
> their clicking:
> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1760263&page=2
>
> What Zimbra do:
> http://www.zimbra.com/forums/zimbra-mobile/58739-sgs3-activesync-sender-name-incorrect.html
> (allow for the server to override the client's setting)
>
> I've tried the clicking quickly thing; I can't get it to work.
>
> Would you be receptive to a feature request to allow for an override  
> based on the profile configuration?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Sure, create an enhancement ticket and I will review it when I have the time.

Mike
Sent from mobile

Tom Seeley <horde at tomseeley.co.uk> wrote: