[horde] Share calendar via "private address"

[Jan Schneider]

Zitat von Michael J Rubinsky <mrubinsk at horde.org>:

> Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
>
>> Zitat von Michael J Rubinsky <mrubinsk at horde.org>:
>>
>>> Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
>>>
>>>> Zitat von Michael J Rubinsky <mrubinsk at horde.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> Quoting Frank Richter <frank.richter at hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Quoting Michael J Rubinsky:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Quoting Frank Richter <frank.richter at hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> pardon me, if this is a FAQ:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there a possibility to give read access on a Kronolith  
>>>>>>>> calendar via a URL without authentication?
>>>>>>>> Like this "private address" in Google -  
>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/calendar/ical/.../private-c0feb88c.../basic.ics
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... and without giving access to everybody within Horde.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Frank Richter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chemnitz University of Technolgy, Germany
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://bugs.horde.org/ticket/7775
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, I just don't know how to do this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> just create a new share (it has a random id)  and set perms to
>>>>>> READ|EDIT|DELETE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it settable via the GUI in Calendar - edit calendar ->  
>>>>>> Sharing - advanced sharing options? How?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is basically just saying to create a new publicly viewable  
>>>>> calendar. Those instructions were from long ago (Horde 3) and  
>>>>> were really just a hackish workaround and don't really make  
>>>>> sense now.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure why this shouldn't still work.
>>>
>>> I guess it would still work if you wanted to start with a brand  
>>> new calendar. I thought the question was rather related to giving  
>>> someone access to an existing calendar without the need for  
>>> authentication.
>>
>> Should still work, if you give all but SHOW (and maybe DELEGATE)  
>> permissions to guests, and if guest access to Kronolith in general  
>> is allowed. The only "issue" is with very old default calendars  
>> which used to have an id matching the user name, which is of course  
>> too easily guessable to be used as a private address.
>
> True. Only thing missing from the Google implementation then is  
> being able to change the ID and/or regenerate it in the case you  
> need to revoke previous access to some.

Exactly.

-- 
Jan Schneider
The Horde Project
http://www.horde.org/