[imapproxy] Fwd: imapproxy performance notes?
Eric Rostetter
eric.rostetter at physics.utexas.edu
Wed Mar 5 20:15:49 PST 2003
Quoting Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
> ----- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von dpowicki at oit.umass.edu -----
> Datum: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 19:57:22 -0500
> Von: David Powicki <dpowicki at oit.umass.edu>
> Antwort an: David Powicki <dpowicki at oit.umass.edu>
> Betreff: imapproxy performance notes?
> An: jan at horde.org
>
>
>
> Jan,
>
> I was reading hte perf. notes on imapproxy from te CVS tree. In there
> you mention that you see "IMP works up to 2 times slower, when it uses
> the imapproxy." Is this the case, is it slower? Seems kind of counter
> intuitive...
In most cases it is faster. In some cases, mostly solaris cases, it
is slower. You milage may vary. Best thing is to try it, and if it
doesn't work then try another proxy instead.
>
> Thanks
>
> David
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
Why get even? Get odd!
More information about the imapproxy
mailing list