[imp] php4.0.4 safe?
??
vincentchuwh@hotmail.com
Mon, 1 Jan 2001 01:24:08 -0000
hi,
absolutely safe, I'm using php 4.0.4 with imp 2.2.3
cheers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "andrew morgan" <morgan@orst.edu>
To: <imp@lists.horde.org>
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 12:41 AM
Subject: [imp] php4.0.4 safe?
>
> Is it safe to upgrade to php4.0.4? I'm running imp 2.2.3 and horde 1.2.3
> with php4.0.3pl1 right now. It sounds like there are some useful fixes in
> 4.0.4, but the changelog also mentions some changes to functions. Has
> anyone else tried 4.0.4 yet?
>
> Andy
>
>
> --
> IMP mailing list: http://horde.org/imp/
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
> To unsubscribe, mail: imp-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
>
>
>From anil@recoil.org Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 12:20:54 +0000
Return-Path: <anil@recoil.org>
Mailing-List: contact imp-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list imp@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 53916 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2001 12:20:55 -0000
Received: from total.recoil.org (212.25.240.40)
by horde.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2001 12:20:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 25219 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2001 12:20:54 -0000
Received: from m509-mp1-cvx1b.lis.ntl.com ( [m509-mp1-cvx1b.lis.ntl.com])
as user avsm@localhost by horde.recoil.org with HTTP;
Mon, 1 Jan 2001 12:20:54 +0000
Message-ID: <978351654.3a507626241f0@horde.recoil.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 12:20:54 +0000
From: Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>
To: imp@lists.horde.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012311638400.26326-100000@bowman.scf.orst.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012311638400.26326-100000@bowman.scf.orst.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.6-cvs
Subject: Re: [imp] php4.0.4 safe?
Quoting andrew morgan <morgan@orst.edu>:
>
> Is it safe to upgrade to php4.0.4? I'm running imp 2.2.3 and horde 1.2.3
> with php4.0.3pl1 right now. It sounds like there are some useful fixes in
> 4.0.4, but the changelog also mentions some changes to functions. Has
> anyone else tried 4.0.4 yet?
>
It works fine, but you may wish to hold off for a few days,
as a maintainence release of 4.0.4pl1 is due out. I don't
think it fixes any major problems, but it would save you two
upgrades.
--
Anil Madhavapeddy, <anil@recoil.org>