[imp] shm_key

[Oliver Schulze L.]

Brent J. Nordquist wrote:

> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Oliver Schulze L. <oliver@samera.com.py> wrote:
> 
>> My question is, if I use the shared memory container, should I get a
>> shorter responce in imp?
> 
> 
> I haven't ever measured this, but unless your database server is
> overloaded I wouldn't think it would make that much of a difference.
> 
>> And when I configure to use shm, the is a shm_value with a warning
>> saying that this value should be unique. Ho do I know that this is a
>> unique value? Or better, how do I choose a unique value?
> 
> 
> Just leave the shm_key set to that value... it's very unlikely that
> anything else in your system would be using that particular one.  (It just
> has to be unique vs. other applications in your system.)
> 

Thanks,
I will try the shm container and see if there is an increase in perfomance.
I want to reduce the disc utilization because I also use squid and a 
mail server in the
same machine and I have a loot of users.

Oliver

-- 
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver@samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay