[imp] Permformance issue

Terry Poperszky Terry.Poperszky@SosStaffing.com
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:22:46 -0600


Particularly unhelpful response, purposely obtuse. 

All things being equal and assuming that you do not purposely degrade the
performance of one installation of over another is there a reason (i.e.
performance) to install horde/imp on the mail server rather than a remote
machine in the same facility. 

Terry Poperszky 


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rostetter [mailto:eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu] 
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Terry Poperszky
Cc: imp@lists.horde.org
Subject: Re: [imp] Permformance issue


Quoting Terry Poperszky <Terry.Poperszky@SosStaffing.com>:

> Is there a substantial performance gain by hosting the Horde/IMP on 
> the mail server vs. a another server in the same facility?
> 
> Terry Poperszky

Depends on how you implement it is both cases.  ;) 

Performance is always implementation dependent.  You can make it either
faster or slower in either configuration.

-- 
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin

"TAD (Technology Attachment Disorder) is an unshakable, impractical devotion
to a brand, platform, product line, or programming language. It's relatively
harmless among the rank and file, but when management is afflicted the
damage can be measured in dollars. It's also contagious -- someone with
sufficient political clout can infect an entire organization."

--"Enterprise Strategies" columnist Tom Yager.