[imp] Permformance issue
Terry Poperszky
Terry.Poperszky@SosStaffing.com
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 17:22:46 -0600
Particularly unhelpful response, purposely obtuse.
All things being equal and assuming that you do not purposely degrade the
performance of one installation of over another is there a reason (i.e.
performance) to install horde/imp on the mail server rather than a remote
machine in the same facility.
Terry Poperszky
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rostetter [mailto:eric.rostetter@physics.utexas.edu]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Terry Poperszky
Cc: imp@lists.horde.org
Subject: Re: [imp] Permformance issue
Quoting Terry Poperszky <Terry.Poperszky@SosStaffing.com>:
> Is there a substantial performance gain by hosting the Horde/IMP on
> the mail server vs. a another server in the same facility?
>
> Terry Poperszky
Depends on how you implement it is both cases. ;)
Performance is always implementation dependent. You can make it either
faster or slower in either configuration.
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
"TAD (Technology Attachment Disorder) is an unshakable, impractical devotion
to a brand, platform, product line, or programming language. It's relatively
harmless among the rank and file, but when management is afflicted the
damage can be measured in dollars. It's also contagious -- someone with
sufficient political clout can infect an entire organization."
--"Enterprise Strategies" columnist Tom Yager.