[imp] reply to galore..

[Jan Schneider]

Zitat von LALOT Dominique <dom.lalot at gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> I'm still stuck with some bad behaviours about replies. That's a pity we
> don't have a prefs to get rid of auto mode. I am obliged to patch the code
> and we are a lot annoyed but the reply-to-all behaviour.
>
> I try to understand:
> Here is the header:
>
> From: <mlievre at xx.com>
> To: "'sympa-fr at cr.fr'" <sympa-fr at cr.fr>,
>         =?iso-8859-1?Q?=27Ga=EBl__=27?= <Gael at ds.fr>
> no reply_to, and some List-xxx lines about sympa-fr
>
> 1. If I try reply (so auto), it replies to the list (not all in fact)
> so sympa-fr at cr.fr

Correct behavior.

> 2. If I choose reply to list, that's the same

Correct behavior.

> 3. If I choose sender, it replies to sympa-fr at cr.fr, mlievre at xx.com

Wrong.

> 4. If I choose reply to all, it replies to sympa-fr at cr.fr and cc Gael at ds.fr

Wrong.

> 4: it forgot to reply tomlievre at xx.com
> 3: should have replied to mlievre at xx.com

Correct, but I don't see these bugs happening personally.

> That's a nightmare, as it's a little bit randomized..
> Most of our sympa mailing lists can be configured whith
> reply_to_sender or reply_to_list. I allways choose reply_to_sender to
> configure
> We have some big lists to send information as newsletters, it's non
> sense to reply to list.

But that's the purpose of lists. That won't change.

> It seems that something has changed recently and introduce some bug.
> The point 3 behaviour is tricky and 4 is forgetting somebody
> We can't stay with the fact that reply to sender is not working
> correctly! -> from or reply_to and NOTHING ELSE!

Then create a bug report.

Jan.

-- 
The Horde Project
http://www.horde.org/