[ingo] Ingo and Sieve IMAP flag Extension

[Daniel Eckl]

Well, I commented out the php script lines which are adding the "removeflag"
action and since then it works like a charm.

This flag seems to work like specified in the RFC's and not "mode like".

Greets
Daniel

Am 29.09.2003 schrieb jeffreyb at futureschool.com.au:

> I have just had a look at a particular users mail and it seems he is
> using the Seen flag exactly like this. And yes there is duplicate
> messages in the queue too.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:33, Jan Schneider wrote:
> > Zitat von Daniel Eckl <daniel.eckl at gmx.de>:
> >
> > > Hi List!
> > >
> > > I have a problem regarding how ingo builds the sieve script for
> setting
> > > IMAP
> > > flags on messages.
> > >
> > > E.g. if I want a filtered message to be flagged as seen, then ingo
> build
> > > a
> > > script like:
> > >
> > > if address :all :comparator "i;ascii-casemap" :contains "To"
> > > "virusalert at domain.net"  {
> > >     addflag "\\Seen";
> > >     fileinto "Archiv.virusalert";
> > >     removeflag "\\Seen";
> > >     stop;
> > > }
> > >
> > > This "removeflag" seems to crash cyrus' lmtpd silently with error
> code 75
> > > but the message will be delivered nevertheless (!!!), so all mails
> which
> > > should be flagged will be delivered and flagged correctly _and_ stay
> as
> > > duplicate in the mailqueue. *brrrrr* I had spent a lot of time to
> figure
> > > this out...
> >
> > Yeah, I experienced the same here too.
> >
> > > Regarding to the corresponding Internet Draft
> > >
> >
>
(http://www.globecom.net/ietf/draft/draft-melnikov-sieve-imapflags-00.html)
> > > I think this should work without an error, but I miss the sense in
> the
> > > action "removeflag". If I change the script and delete the
> "removeflag"
> > > action, all is working fine, lmtpd exits with status 0 and the
> messages
> > > will be flagged and moved and all you want.
> > >
> > > So what should the "removeflag" do exactly? Could we leave it out
> > > completely
> > > or, if this action has a sense, can we accomplish this in another
> way, so
> > > cyrus' lmtpd won't have problems?
> >
> > The reason is that these flags are not single message flags but rather
> > "modes". That means that each message that is filed after "addflag"
> will
> > get this flag, not only the message handled in the if block.
> >
> > Jan.
> >
> > --
> > http://www.horde.org - The Horde Project
> > http://www.ammma.de - discover your knowledge
> > http://www.tip4all.de - Deine private Tippgemeinschaft
> --
> Jeffrey Borg <jeffreyb at futureschool.com.au>
>
> --
> Ingo mailing list
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
> To unsubscribe, mail: ingo-unsubscribe at lists.horde.org
>
>
>