[kronolith] shared calendars via ldap users
list-kronolith@dragon.net
list-kronolith@dragon.net
Mon, 03 Sep 2001 14:21:24 -0700
tdavis> We recently added import/export stuff, so we probably will
tdavis> soon be able to send or recieve iCalendar entries from or to
tdavis> kronolith with imp.
janmailing> The format Outlook exports IS actually vCalendar or
janmailing> iCalendar (== vCalendar 2.0) it just doesn't support all
janmailing> features of this standard. But once we have iCal support
janmailing> in kronolith it should work more or less with Outlook.
Well, as a user of ical for years, I cheer this. However, I'd have to
agree with Ted that a graceful way of sharing with OutLook is going to
be a necessary evil in getting Kronolith sold to the (user) powers
that be. Sounds like Ted might be a good test subject. B^)
--
Paul
>From tdavis@birddog.com Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:22:17 -0500
Return-Path: <tdavis@birddog.com>
Mailing-List: contact kronolith-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list kronolith@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 58344 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2001 21:23:07 -0000
Received: from hermes.birddog.com (63.125.164.131)
by horde.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2001 21:23:07 -0000
Received: from localhost (prometheus.birddog.com [10.2.0.4])
by hermes.birddog.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f83LNei15009
for <kronolith@lists.horde.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:23:40 -0500
Received: from 10.10.4.1 ( [10.10.4.1])
as user td@imap.birddog.com by secure.birddog.com with HTTP;
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:22:17 -0500
Message-ID: <999552137.3b93f489d032b@secure.birddog.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:22:17 -0500
From: Terry Davis <tdavis@birddog.com>
To: kronolith@lists.horde.org
References: <200109032121.f83LLOL16609@ns1.pae.com>
In-Reply-To: <200109032121.f83LLOL16609@ns1.pae.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
X-Originating-IP: 10.10.4.1
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 1.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)
Subject: Re: [kronolith] shared calendars via ldap users
Ted?
:)
--
Terry Davis
Systems Administrator
BirdDog Solutions, Inc.
(402) 829-6059
Quoting list-kronolith@dragon.net:
>
> tdavis> We recently added import/export stuff, so we probably will
> tdavis> soon be able to send or recieve iCalendar entries from or to
> tdavis> kronolith with imp.
>
> janmailing> The format Outlook exports IS actually vCalendar or
> janmailing> iCalendar (== vCalendar 2.0) it just doesn't support all
> janmailing> features of this standard. But once we have iCal support
> janmailing> in kronolith it should work more or less with Outlook.
>
> Well, as a user of ical for years, I cheer this. However, I'd have to
> agree with Ted that a graceful way of sharing with OutLook is going to
> be a necessary evil in getting Kronolith sold to the (user) powers
> that be. Sounds like Ted might be a good test subject. B^)
>
> --
> Paul
>
> --
> Kronolith mailing list: http://horde.org/kronolith/
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
> To unsubscribe, mail: kronolith-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>From tdavis@birddog.com Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:30:35 -0500
Return-Path: <tdavis@birddog.com>
Mailing-List: contact kronolith-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list kronolith@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 73498 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2001 03:31:26 -0000
Received: from hermes.birddog.com (63.125.164.131)
by horde.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 03:31:26 -0000
Received: from localhost (prometheus.birddog.com [10.2.0.4])
by hermes.birddog.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f843Vxi16379
for <kronolith@lists.horde.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:32:00 -0500
Received: from 10.10.4.1 ( [10.10.4.1])
as user td@imap.birddog.com by secure.birddog.com with HTTP;
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:30:35 -0500
Message-ID: <999574235.3b944adb5d6f6@secure.birddog.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:30:35 -0500
From: Terry Davis <tdavis@birddog.com>
To: kronolith@lists.horde.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
X-Originating-IP: 10.10.4.1
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 1.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)
Subject: db change through updates
Do you guys take into consideration database changes and how to update the
database to avoid data loss, even on cvs version updates? In other words, do
you notate somewhere that "this version of code will require you to do blah
blah to your database or you will foobar the data"? ;)
Thank you
--
Terry Davis
Systems Administrator
BirdDog Solutions, Inc.
(402) 829-6059
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>From chuck@horde.org Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:41:52 -0400
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact kronolith-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list kronolith@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 74492 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2001 03:43:56 -0000
Received: from h00104bc60b3c.ne.mediaone.net (HELO marina.horde.org) (24.91.198.7)
by horde.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 03:43:56 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 27B9B39F4; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 192.168.0.120 ( [192.168.0.120])
as user chuck@localhost by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:41:52 -0400
Message-ID: <999574912.3b944d8005dcb@marina.horde.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:41:52 -0400
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: kronolith@lists.horde.org
References: <999574235.3b944adb5d6f6@secure.birddog.com>
In-Reply-To: <999574235.3b944adb5d6f6@secure.birddog.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
Subject: Re: [kronolith] db change through updates
Quoting Terry Davis <tdavis@birddog.com>:
> Do you guys take into consideration database changes and how to update the
> database to avoid data loss, even on cvs version updates? In other words, do
> you notate somewhere that "this version of code will require you to do blah
> blah to your database or you will foobar the data"? ;)
While things are pre-alpha, no. Once we get to releases, we generally don't
make such changes, but if we did, it would be obvious in the change
announcement.
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
Some fallen angels have their good reasons.