[kronolith] Sort events by Tag/Categorie

[lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de]

Zitat von Arnold Krille <arnold at arnoldarts.de>:

> On 04.07.2012 11:24, Jan Schneider wrote:
>> Zitat von Arnold Krille <arnold at arnoldarts.de>:
>>> On 03.07.2012 21:21, Jan Schneider wrote:
>>>> Zitat von Arnold Krille <arnold at arnoldarts.de>:
>>>>> On 03.07.2012 16:04, Jan Schneider wrote:
>>>>>> Zitat von lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de:
>>>>>>> Zitat von Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>:
>>>>>>>> Zitat von lst_hoe02 at kwsoft.de:
>>>>>>>>> is it somehow possible to mark events in kronolith so one can
>>>>>>>>> easily
>>>>>>>>> display only events matching this marker? I have look at categories
>>>>>>>>> which seems not to be used in kronolith and tags which looks like
>>>>>>>>> simple plain-text to me? Any idea how this can be achieved?
>>>>>>>> Use different calendars. That's why we have them.
>>>>>>> The users like to tag events by project for example and let a
>>>>>>> external
>>>>>>> tool create some statistic out of the iCal. It wouldn't be handy to
>>>>>>> have a calendar for every project, no?
>>>>>> Why not? Sounds completely fine.
>>>>> While this might technically scale well to >100 projects/customers, the
>>>>> gui and calendar-list one user see will be overwhelming a well beyond
>>>>> "this scales up".
>>>> That's why there is an option to not show all available calendars by
>>>> default but to use invitations and subscriptions instead. Or are there
>>>> users who should really see all >100 projects?
>>> Yep: El'Chefe
>>> And more importantly the friendly ladies from accounts who look at all
>>> the calendars for billable times and add a tag "billed" once their
>>> printers did the work.
>>
>> For billable times there is the time tracker module Hermes ;-)
>
> Yep, is that stable yet?
>
> We want to test hermes, but I don't yet like the idea of mixing pear
> with git/svn for our installation.
>
> And then: Does hermes integrate with kronolith? We don't want to do
> time-sheets, we want to add calendar-entries of what we did and bill for
> that.

This really sounds like a useful feature...
We also have the need (like many) to bill some of the "events" which  
are in fact on-site service time.

Will this be possible or is it even planed?

Regards

Andreas