[nag] Nag Stage 6
Jon Parise
jon@csh.rit.edu
Tue, 22 May 2001 13:35:03 -0400
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:23:12PM -0400, Matt Powell wrote:
> Not to jump into a conversation halfway, as I just joined the list, but why
> not use the time stamp of the due date combined with a priority ranking
> assigned when the task is created to handle its postion?
I think a priority bit would be useful, but it would add another
level of complexity to the system. I'm open to input on this
from both directions.
--
Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member