[nag] priorities: 1-5 or 1-9?
Chuck Hagenbuch
chuck at horde.org
Sat Apr 29 20:13:41 PDT 2006
Quoting Karsten Fourmont <fourmont at gmx.de>:
> 1) stay with our 1-5 priorities. Map then from/to rfc2445 when
> exporting/importing vcalendar data
> 2) convert our priorities to 1-9
>
> I prefer 2). Any other suggestions or comments?
It's certainly simpler... what would that conversion process look
like, in your mind?
-chuck
--
"we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris
More information about the nag
mailing list