[turba] Correct Way to Implement Public & Private Addressbooks?

[Terry Davis]

I would strongly recommend that you implement ldap and stuff your entries in 
it vs sql.  The reason for this is it is a more standard way and other popular 
mail clients interface to an ldap, not an sql server.

Just a humble opinion as I do not know your situation.

-- 
Terry Davis
Systems Administrator
BirdDog Solutions, Inc.
(402) 829-6059


Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>:

> Quoting m.ibarra@cdcixis-na.com:
> 
> > I currently have my "localsql" set to "public => true"
> > Am I correct to believe that I simply need to create another 
> > group, ie "privatesql or private" with similiar entries for
> > this? How and where do I make it so that a user upon
> > adding an entry makes it either public and/or private?
> 
> Yup. If there are multiple addressbooks that are writeable, the user will be
> 
> prompted which to add it to when they click "Add". Addresses added from IMP
> 
> will be added to whichever addressbook is selected in IMP's 'add_source' 
> preference.
> 
> -chuck
> 
> --
> Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
> Some fallen angels have their good reasons.
> 
> -- 
> Turba mailing list: http://horde.org/turba/
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
> To unsubscribe, mail: turba-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
> 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/