[turba] How many are using virtual address books?

[Michael Rubinsky]

Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck at horde.org>:

> Hi folks-
>
> I need a quick sense of how widely used virtual address books are.
> I've been rewriting the code for them for Turba 2.2 (partially because
> of requirements of the new Share code), and in the process it seemed
> that it wasn't possible to create one as-is in HEAD. So I need to know
> if anyone was using them, and if so, if you need an upgrade script for
> them.
>
> I'll admit I'd prefer not to do it; they're saved searches and don't
> have any data of their own.

I had a client that was using them with FW_3 code.  They were  
essentially using them as an automatically updated distribution list  
type thingie. I do not do work for these people any longer, so I don't  
know if they are still using this.

While I still feel they are a useful addition to Turba, I would not be  
*too* upset to see them go.  Though I do hate to see code I wrote get  
cut.... ;)

I have not looked at Turba recently...Chuck, mostly out of curiosity,  
do you know what broke this in HEAD?


Thanks,
mike

--
The Horde Project (www.horde.org)
mrubinsk at horde.org

"Time just hates me. That's why it made me an adult." - Josh Joplin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 2013 bytes
Desc: PGP Public Key
Url : http://lists.horde.org/archives/turba/attachments/20070617/d784e0c9/attachment.bin