[turba] How many are using virtual address books?

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting Michael Rubinsky <mike at theupstairsroom.com>:

> I had a client that was using them with FW_3 code.  They were   
> essentially using them as an automatically updated distribution list  
>  type thingie. I do not do work for these people any longer, so I  
> don't  know if they are still using this.
>
> While I still feel they are a useful addition to Turba, I would not  
> be  *too* upset to see them go.  Though I do hate to see code I  
> wrote get  cut.... ;)

I'm not talking about cutting them, I'm talking about having people  
re-create them after upgrading to 2.2/HEAD.

I don't have any intention of removing the feature, though I did  
simplify it a bit. Hearing you say "automatically updated distribution  
lists", though, I wonder if it would make more sense to have virtual  
contact groups instead of virtual address books. That way you _could_  
email the results of a search.

> I have not looked at Turba recently...Chuck, mostly out of  
> curiosity,  do you know what broke this in HEAD?

There was one error because shares were being saved twice, which was  
confusing but not fatal, but also vbooks weren't saving their  
criteria. I don't know why that was.

-chuck