[whups] Assignment patch

[Scott Singleton]

why are we not going back to horde to authenticate and pick users?  Is there
a design and direction document for WHUPS?  Right now it stands totally
apart from the rest of the horde suite.

besides IMP, whups and nag are the two primary reasons I'm going with the
Horde suite. I can't wait for these to more forward and (possibly?) be
integrated.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Leverington [mailto:admin@networkessence.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:24 AM
To: whups@lists.horde.org
Subject: Re: [whups] Assignment patch



why do I always forget the attachment ;)

Here's the attachment

-Alex

Quoting Alex Leverington <admin@networkessence.net>:

> > Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>:
> > 
> [snip]
> > > Most of this patch failed to apply for me. I committed the bits that
> did
> > > apply;
> [snip] 
> > it's good to change it as I go. What failed to apply?
> 
> Nothing applied it looks like :)
> 
> Here is the diff that follows CODING_STANDARDS and uses the proper table
> format.
> I've also tested the code as of the attached diff and it works. It uses
the
> 
> proper
> function {
>     //
> }
> format and uses the new applied table format in the SQL queries. As soon
as
> 
> this is patched, I will submit a patch so that ALL the whups code is
standard
> 
> with the horde coding standards and will start on the user backend. The
user
> 
> backend will not just use an sql table.
> 
> The table script is:
> 
> create table whups_users (
>     user_id varchar(32) not null,
>     user_name varchar(64),
>     user_email varchar(96),
>     primary key (user_id)
> );
> 
> -Alex
> 
> -- 
> Whups mailing list: http://horde.org/whups/
> Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
> To unsubscribe, mail: whups-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
> 





>From chuck@horde.org Date: Fri,  2 Nov 2001 20:01:22 -0500
Return-Path: <chuck@horde.org>
Mailing-List: contact whups-help@lists.horde.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list whups@lists.horde.org
Received: (qmail 15580 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2001 01:02:00 -0000
Received: from h00104bc60b3c.ne.mediaone.net (HELO marina.horde.org) (24.91.197.108)
  by clark.horde.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2001 01:02:00 -0000
Received: by marina.horde.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 3A25139B0; Fri,  2 Nov 2001 20:01:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 192.168.0.198 ( [192.168.0.198])
	as user chuck@localhost by marina.horde.org with HTTP;
	Fri,  2 Nov 2001 20:01:22 -0500
Message-ID: <1004749282.3be341e20e2ba@marina.horde.org>
Date: Fri,  2 Nov 2001 20:01:22 -0500
From: Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck@horde.org>
To: whups@lists.horde.org
References: <87CA342C2861B246B6FBC9B24412C75C0260DF@bcs-nt40.beacon-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <87CA342C2861B246B6FBC9B24412C75C0260DF@bcs-nt40.beacon-inc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs
Subject: RE: [whups] Assignment patch

Quoting Scott Singleton <scott@beacon-inc.com>:

> why are we not going back to horde to authenticate and pick users?  Is there
> a design and direction document for WHUPS?  Right now it stands totally
> apart from the rest of the horde suite.

Not completely. And the plan is for it to use Horde for all kinds of users; 
currently it uses them for "public" users only.

> besides IMP, whups and nag are the two primary reasons I'm going with the
> Horde suite. I can't wait for these to more forward and (possibly?) be
> integrated.

Great! I look forward to your patches!

(btw, what do you want to be more integrated in Nag?)

-chuck

--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
"What was and what may be, lie, like children whose faces we cannot see, in the
arms of silence. All we ever have is here, now." - Ursula K. Le Guin