[whups] Using whups moving forward
Tue Nov 12 02:00:35 2002
Quoting Mike Baptiste <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> We're using IMP for backend authentication if that matters. With WHups
> installed, we created a top level group called IT Support. It never
> showed up.
> OK - so we threw in Nag and Mnemo which created two groups called
> nag:shares and mnemo:shares. Suddenly THOSE showed up in teh group
> chooser in teh comment window.
> Well, on a lark, I create a group whups:IT Support and threw my users in
> there -viola! They showed up. Course even with this set, guests can
> still read the comments (I'm working on that)
Are you still having these problems? Groups seem to work fine for me...
> Oh yeah - I see the atatchment tables in teh DB - has any coding been
> done on this yet (I haven't had a chance to look yet) This is one area
> we're hoping to tackle soon. Has any thought been givin to using the
> new VFS stuff for attachments? If not, should the attachment_body field
> be a long blob instead?
We should definitely use the VFS for any attachments. I've nuked the table
> Did't mean to unload - just have been busy getting whups up and running
> with our team and had queued a bunch of these up.
Not a problem at all - glad to hear your install is gathering steam!
Charles Hagenbuch, <email@example.com>
"People ask me all the time what it will be like living without otters."
- Google, thanks to Harpers
More information about the whups