Fwd: Re: [whups] Possible change - numeric priorities?

Jeff Warnica jeffw at chebucto.ns.ca
Wed Apr 7 11:43:03 PDT 2004


Regardless of if the default comes with 100 priorities or not, I think
it would be good to somehow document the priorities. That is, choose
what you want to call them, and how many there are, but 1 is always the
highest. Or always the lowest. Whatever.

On Wed, 2004-07-04 at 14:13 -0400, Jason M. Felice wrote:

> > Well I already name priorities with numbers at the start (and the default
> > priorities do that too) like '1. Low', '2. Medium' etc.. That's just
> > enough to
> I number my priorities, too. I have 1. Urgent, 2. High, 3. Normal, 4. Low, 5.
> Postponed.
> 




More information about the whups mailing list