[whups] formalizing SQL dependancy

[Chuck Hagenbuch]

Quoting Jon Parise <jon at horde.org>:

>> If not, it might be worth it to just compress the SQL driver into a
>> single Whups_Driver class, acknowledging that this will always be a
>> database-dependent application, and gaining a slightly smaller
>> codebass/class tree in return.
>
> I think that's fine, as long as we stick to a database abstraction
> layer.  For those sites that aren't interested in setting up a full
> RDBMS, SQLite is a nice option.

Yes - but you reminded me of the reason I wanted to keep it: to be able to
easily try out different abstraction layers at some point (I'd like to try an
MDB2 driver for whups). So I guess I've decided I'm keeping it for now. :)

-chuck

--
"Regard my poor demoralized mule!" - Juan Valdez