[dev] Candidates for 1.X releases

Eric Jon Rostetter eric.rostetter at physics.utexas.edu
Thu Feb 2 10:43:56 PST 2006


Quoting Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck at horde.org>:

> Quoting Eric Jon Rostetter <eric.rostetter at physics.utexas.edu>:
>
>> _If_ that can be done, then definately.  I just switched my own installation
>> over to ingo last week, so I no longer need vacation/forwards. But I'm not
>> sure if all the drivers in sork can be moved to Ingo, anyone know?
>
> Not off hand, but I think this is the ideal direction - having a
> single place to control these is best for both users and developers.

I agree.

> Perhaps we should endeavor to release versions of vacation and
> forwards that work with Horde 3.x stable, and once a version is
> avaiable, immediately deprecate the modules and move further work into
> Ingo HEAD. That gives us a road map, and doesn't leave users hanging
> while we work on the integrated module.

I agree with that as a good roadmap.

>> If we could do that, we could eliminate all of sork except passwd.  Which is
>> fine with me.  But if we can't move all the functionality to ingo, then we
>> need to keep sork up because there are a lot of sork users out there...
>
> And passwd could (and perhaps should) be further integrated into Horde
> itself, along the lines of the resetpassword functionality...

Yes, but it is a separate issue from the sork/ingo issue, so I was treating
it separately. ;)

> -chuck

-- 
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin

Go Longhorns!


More information about the dev mailing list