[dev] RDO relationship question

[Duck]

On Monday 10 July 2006 10:02, Chuck Hagenbuch wrote:
> I agree. I think it would be a great feature; I worry that it might be
> a bit complicated to implement, but maybe not... if we add a boolean
> state bit to RDO objects saying whether or not they've been modified
> since last load or save, then we could look through relationships on
> save() for other modified bits.

Thinking forward, instead of a boolean value maybe and array of fields 
modified would be better. It will can contain the fields changes. So the 
save() can will update only this fields. It will be less overhead with 
sending  unchanged data to SQL. If the array is empty, the object was not 
changed.

Duck