[horde] Slow response times

Simon Wilson simon at simonandkate.net
Wed Apr 23 00:44:15 UTC 2014


----- Message from Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org> ---------
    Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:14:50 +0200
    From: Jan Schneider <jan at horde.org>
Subject: Re: [horde] Slow response times
      To: horde at lists.horde.org


> Zitat von simon at simonandkate.net:
>
>> Sent from Samsung tablet
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Michael M Slusarz
>> Date:19/04/2014 01:54 (GMT+10:00)
>> To: horde at lists.horde.org
>> Subject: Re: [horde] Slow response times
>>
>> Quoting Simon Wilson <simon at simonandkate.net>:
>>
>>> ----- Message from Simon Wilson <simon at simonandkate.net> ---------
>>>      Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:21:48 +1000
>>>      From: Simon Wilson <simon at simonandkate.net>
>>> Reply-To: simon at simonandkate.net
>>>   Subject: [horde] Slow response times
>>>        To: horde at lists.horde.org
>>>
>>>

snip

>> One thing I noticed was what appears to be a lack of logging, even  
>> at high log levels. 
>>
>> Should a Gollem vfs backend fail like this not be notified to admin  
>> through log entries? Would have saved a lot of time and  
>> troubleshooting. 
>>
>> Simon 
>
> No, because this is from trying to display the backends in the top  
> menu, if possible. It's fine to fail at this point, so that we only  
> display the main Gollem entry. Thus no notification. We also don't  
> try to authenticate if transparent authentication is disabled.
> But if you enable transparent authentication, it's your job to keep  
> it working.
>
> -- 
> Jan Schneider

I accept that it is fine to fail, and the fallback to only display the  
Gollem entry without the backends is the logical action, but why not  
log that it has failed? I'm not talking about inline notification, but  
a horde log entry possibly at WARN or NOTICE level that mapping a  
backend has failed would be a logical response to a failure.

If the authentication error is caught to fallback to main Gollem entry  
only, can that fallback routine not advise to  that effect to the  
Horde log engine?

I'll check out transparent authentication, it's not something I have  
ever seen / know anything about with Horde. How is it configured?

Simon

--
Simon Wilson
M: 0400 12 11 16
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 1339 bytes
Desc: PGP Public Key
URL: <http://lists.horde.org/archives/horde/attachments/20140423/7b306275/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: PGP Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.horde.org/archives/horde/attachments/20140423/7b306275/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the horde mailing list