[imp] strange things in summary
Jon Parise
jon@csh.rit.edu
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:23:52 -0400
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:16:23PM +0200, Jan Schneider wrote:
> > My concern with this is that the summaries are supposed to be
> > fairly light- weight; opening each folder in turn to list
> > unread messages would get fairly expensive. Also, it opens
> > the door to serious feature-creep - I don't want it to be a
> > mini-mailbox view.
>
> I understand your intention. Perhaps a solution could be to
> read a maximum of - let's say - three or five messages of each
> folder.
That would still involve opening each folder, which is the
performance hit we're trying to avoid here. The number of
messages read is largely irrelevant.
--
Jon Parise (jon@csh.rit.edu) . Rochester Inst. of Technology
http://www.csh.rit.edu/~jon/ : Computer Science House Member