[imp] wordwrap message lines at 72

[Michael M Slusarz]

Quoting Tim Bannister <Tim.Bannister at manchester.ac.uk>:

> It doesn't have to be 76. I think IMP 4.1 used to reflow messages  
> for me (compared to the original, flowed format wrapping). It's a  
> good idea to have a wrap width, but ideally this would be a user  
> preference (and maybe another for whether to do this at all).

The wrap width used to hardcoded to 90 I think.  But 90 was just a  
number I picked out of thin air, because it seemed to "fit" best with  
the screen resolutions I had access to.

michael

-- 
___________________________________
Michael Slusarz [slusarz at horde.org]